You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
| |
RF
|
NB
|
NJ
|
|---|
|
A priori classification
|
S. per
|
S. cor
|
Other
|
S. per
|
S. cor
|
Other
|
S. per
|
S. cor
|
Other
|
|---|
|
S. peruvianum (n = 12)
|
0.92
|
0.08
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
0.75
|
0.25
|
0.00
|
|
S. corneliomulleri (n = 4)
|
1.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.25
|
0.75
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.00
|
| |
1-NN
|
3-NN
|
|---|
|
A priori classification
|
S. per
|
S. cor
|
Other
|
S. per
|
S. cor
|
Other
|
|---|
|
S. peruvianum (n = 12)
|
0.75
|
0.25
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
S. corneliomulleri (n = 4)
|
0.75
|
0.25
|
0.00
|
0.25
|
0.67
|
0.25
|
- Confusion matrix of the AFLP tomato dataset, showing fractionally how often S. peruvianum and S. corneliomulleri are classified as themselves, as each other, and as other species by Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), Neighbour-Joining (NJ), 1-Nearest Neighbour (1-NN), and 3-Nearest Neighbours (3-NN)